01
The deal starts before the first file.
An amount and a date do not make a project clear. Clarity comes when the client can explain what they will receive, what they need to confirm and what follows their response. That preparation means the freelancer does not carry all the context alone.
In Dealokr, scope definition starts the record. It connects project terms to review and handoff. A change affecting the result can then become a new phase rather than an implied request.
02
Payment is a status, not a promise.
The client completes the payment step with the configured deal provider. Dealokr displays the returned status alongside terms and next actions; it does not collect or hold funds or guarantee a transaction outcome.
This lets the freelancer identify the visible trigger without claiming to replace the payment provider, bank or applicable payment rules.
03
Delivery should produce an actionable response.
A review delivery should show what the client is examining and the expected decision. A useful response approves, requests a specific revision or flags a scope issue. This is easier to handle than “it is not quite right”.
After approval, final handoff follows the deal’s agreed route. Access rights in Drive, Figma, GitHub or another platform remain managed by the owner in that tool.
04
History is especially useful when the project becomes difficult.
When a question arises, you do not need to reconstruct the story across a quote, messages, screenshots and several links. Steps, versions and responses can be read in the same context.
This is an operational project record. It does not replace a suitable contract, invoice, legal, tax or accounting advice or the parties’ obligations.
