01
Start with a short, verifiable timeline.
Before responding emotionally, build a timeline: terms or order, relevant payment step, delivered versions, feedback, decision and the currently disputed item. Use factual wording: “version sent on…”, “feedback requested on…”, “approval recorded on…”.
The timeline does not decide who is right. It gives both parties a shared basis for understanding the disagreement.
02
Turn an accusation into a resolution request.
Rather than “you broke the deal”, name the issue and desired next step: “deliverable X lacks item Y, which we understood was included; can you confirm whether you propose a correction, scope adjustment or another solution?”
A clear request avoids debating tone, history and solution at once. It also leaves a readable record if you seek support.
03
Consider mediation as a possible route rather than a threat.
In France, the Médiateur des entreprises describes support for contractual or relationship disputes between businesses, including payment terms or contract performance. Check its conditions and suitability directly with the service.
Your documents may provide other routes. A lawyer, accountant, insurer, association or suitable mediation service may fit better. Do not present Dealokr as a court, mediator or adviser.
04
Preserve relevant context rather than unnecessary data.
The Dealokr record helps retrieve project steps and decisions. Retain necessary documents and exchanges under your obligations, taking care with personal and confidential data.
The aim is an understandable situation for both parties, rather than accumulating screenshots or publishing a dispute. Check obligations and seek suitable professional advice for formal action.
