Disagreement and records

Before escalation, make the facts readable for everyone.

More messages alone do not resolve a disagreement. Find the agreement, relevant version, requests and expected decision first. Dealokr helps organise this record; it does not decide the dispute.

Dealokr supports the deal and its history. Payments and file permissions remain with the relevant providers.

The framework

A useful record allows verification rather than accusation.

This guide is operational and informational. It does not provide legal advice or determine either party’s rights or responsibilities.

  1. 01

    The agreement

    Find the expected result, boundaries, review conditions and relevant stages.

  2. 02

    The facts

    Identify versions, messages and dates before interpreting them.

  3. 03

    The difference

    Describe the apparent departure from the agreement: omission, delay, out-of-scope request or disputed quality.

  4. 04

    The request

    Propose a realistic action and deadline: correct, pay, clarify, revise or agree on an exit.

  5. 05

    The next route

    If needed, consult your documents and a professional or service appropriate to your situation.

In practice

Make the next action clear.

Each step should show who decides, what needs checking and what follows. That makes the workflow useful day to day.

01

Start with a short, verifiable timeline.

Before responding emotionally, build a timeline: terms or order, relevant payment step, delivered versions, feedback, decision and the currently disputed item. Use factual wording: “version sent on…”, “feedback requested on…”, “approval recorded on…”.

The timeline does not decide who is right. It gives both parties a shared basis for understanding the disagreement.

02

Turn an accusation into a resolution request.

Rather than “you broke the deal”, name the issue and desired next step: “deliverable X lacks item Y, which we understood was included; can you confirm whether you propose a correction, scope adjustment or another solution?”

A clear request avoids debating tone, history and solution at once. It also leaves a readable record if you seek support.

03

Consider mediation as a possible route rather than a threat.

In France, the Médiateur des entreprises describes support for contractual or relationship disputes between businesses, including payment terms or contract performance. Check its conditions and suitability directly with the service.

Your documents may provide other routes. A lawyer, accountant, insurer, association or suitable mediation service may fit better. Do not present Dealokr as a court, mediator or adviser.

04

Preserve relevant context rather than unnecessary data.

The Dealokr record helps retrieve project steps and decisions. Retain necessary documents and exchanges under your obligations, taking care with personal and confidential data.

The aim is an understandable situation for both parties, rather than accumulating screenshots or publishing a dispute. Check obligations and seek suitable professional advice for formal action.

Operational checklist

The checklist before sending a disagreement message.

Prepare a specific discussion. This does not replace a formal demand, legal opinion or appropriate procedure.

01

The facts

  • I know which agreement, version and date are involved.
  • I distinguish verifiable facts from my interpretation.
  • I keep useful documents in context.

02

The request

  • I can name the difference without labelling the other party.
  • I propose a specific outcome or question.
  • I set a reasonable response date if needed.

03

The next step

  • I consult the contract and applicable documents.
  • I know when to seek a suitable professional or mediator.
  • I do not confuse Dealokr history with a legal decision.

Useful wording

Simple language for the moments that matter.

Adapt the bracketed details to your situation. These examples clarify the project; they are not legal clauses.

First message

Open the discussion with facts.

“To resolve this point, here is the summary: the deal specifies [result], the relevant version is [name/date] and the point to clarify is [item]. What solution do you propose?”

Make the issue actionable without an accusatory message.

Correction request

Connect the adjustment to scope.

“My reading of the deal is that [item] formed part of the expected result. Can you explain whether you will treat it as a correction, a scope change or another solution?”

The expected response is clear and can be retained in the record.

If discussion stalls

Prepare a measured next route.

“We are not reaching agreement on this point. I suggest rereading the relevant documents and identifying suitable support or advice together before further action.”

Keep an amicable resolution possible without providing legal advice.

A system, rather than an abstract promise

A deal becomes reliable when everyone sees their next action.

The value comes from connecting scope, payment, review, approval and handoff. Keep your commercial documents, obligations and external permissions current separately.

Common questions

Useful answers before starting the project.

Does Dealokr resolve freelancer-client disputes?

No. Dealokr helps reduce ambiguity through terms, payment status, protected delivery and history. It does not decide disputes, represent either party or provide legal advice.

What should I retain during a disagreement?

Documents and exchanges relevant to your situation: terms, versions, decisions, dates and messages. Check retention and confidentiality obligations with a professional if needed.

Can I contact the French Médiateur des entreprises?

For matters within its remit, the service explains its process and conditions on its official website. Check eligibility and the steps applicable to your case directly.

A protected next deal

Keep payment and final handoff in the same deal.

Create a clear project for you and your client, with a protected payment flow through the configured provider, protected delivery and visible approval.