01
Start with the disagreement you want to make unlikely.
Most client disputes are not created by a single bad actor. They grow when the project has no common answer to simple questions: What was included? Which version was approved? When was payment expected? What had to happen before the final package moved?
Write each answer while the deal is friendly. It is much easier to agree a review window, an acceptance criterion, or an excluded task before the work is underway.
02
Use the payment provider for the payment event, and the deal record for context.
A provider can report payment events. Your project record should add the context the event alone cannot provide: which phase it relates to, which deliverable is ready for review, and which action comes next.
Dealokr reflects configured provider states in the deal workflow. It is not a bank, a regulated escrow service, or a substitute for legal advice.
03
Keep a timeline another person can understand.
If a client changes contact, a project manager joins midway, or a question appears months later, the information should not live in screenshots from email, chat, and file storage. A timeline is useful only when it attaches an action to the relevant terms and version.
That makes a payment conversation more factual: you can point to the agreed step and the recorded next action instead of arguing from memory.
Dealokr