01
Agree the review criteria while the project is still calm.
The client should know what ‘ready for review’ means. This can include content accuracy, approved direction, responsive behaviour, format, technical acceptance criteria, or a named set of deliverables. The criteria should describe the result, not create an impossible invitation to revisit every past idea.
Likewise, the freelancer needs a visible revision boundary. It is easier to have a good conversation about a genuine new request when both sides can see what this version was meant to solve.
02
Turn feedback into a controlled next version.
A client may need revisions. The productive question is whether the request helps the deliverable meet the agreed criteria, or whether it changes the result itself. Capture the request beside the reviewed version, state the next action, and provide the next version as a new review event.
This protects the client from feeling ignored and protects the freelancer from quietly carrying an expanding scope. It also gives a future reader a clear sequence of decisions.
03
Do not treat final files as proof of approval.
Giving a client a final package is not the same thing as recording an approval. For deliverables where editable, source, or production-ready files matter, final release should follow the validation route in the deal. This creates a deliberate handoff rather than a one-way transfer that is hard to explain later.
Dealokr can keep the validation and release events connected. It does not independently enforce third-party file permissions or replace the terms agreed by the parties.
Dealokr